Research Articles | Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics

Numerical modelling of heat transfer through protected composite structural members

Burak Kaan Çırpıcı, Süleyman Nazif Orhan, Türkay Kotan


DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2019.03.003

Abstract


Among many various types of passive fire protection materials (i.e. plaster boards, sprayed materials and intumescent coatings) thin film intumescent coatings have become the preferable option owing to their good advantages such as flexibility, good appearance (aesthetics), light weight to the structure and fast application. Despite their popularity, there is also a lack of good understanding of fire behaviour. In general, experimental methods are used to push this knowledge with labour and high-energy consumption and extremely expensive processes. With the development of computer technology, numerical models to predict the heat transfer phenomena of intumescent coatings have been developed with time. In this work, the numerical model has been established to predict the heat transfer performance including material properties such as thermal conductivity and dry film thickness of intumescent coating. The developed numerical model has been divided into different layers to understand the sensitivity of steel temperature to the number of layers of intumescent coating and mesh sizes. The temperature-dependent thermal conductivity of intumescent coatings can be calculated based on inverse solution of the equation for calculating temperatures in protected steel according to the Eurocodes (EN 1993-1-2 and EN 1994-1-2). However, as the temperature distribution in the intumescent coatings is highly non-uniform, that Eurocode equation does not give accurate coating thermal conductivity-temperature relationship for use in numerical heat transfer modelling when the coating is divided into a number of layers, each having its characteristic thermal conductivity values. The comparison study of steel temperature under Standard (ISO 834) and Fast fire conditions against Eurocode analytical solution has also been made by assuming both constant thermal conductivity and variable thermal conductivity. The obtained results show close agreement with the Eurocode solution choosing a minimum certain mesh, number of layer and best-fitted thermal conductivity of the intumescent coating.


Keywords


intumescent coating; heat transfer; numerical model; thermal conductivity; composite floor; steel beam

Full Text:

PDF

References


(ISO) I. O. f. S. (2014). ISO 834-11:2014 Fire resistance tests - Elements of building construction - Part 11: Specific requirements for the assessment of fire protection to structural steel elements.

Alam N, Nadjai A, Ali F, Nadjai W (2018). Structural response of unprotected and protected slim floors in fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 142, 44-54.

Ataçelik (2019). ADP92050 Tam Kesit Ozellikleri (ADP92050 Full Section Properties) [Online]. Available: http://atacelik.net/PDF/P1_ATAPANEL.pdf [Accessed].

Both I, Wald F, Zaharia R (2016). Benchmark for numerical analysis of steel and composite floors exposed to fire using a general purpose FEM code. Journal of Applied Engineering Science, 14, 275-284.

Bourbigot S, Bras ML, Duquesne S, Rochery M (2004). Recent advances for intumescent polymers. Macromolecular Materials and Engineering, 289(6), 499-511.

CEN (2005a). EN 1993-1-2: Eurocode 3. Design of Steel Structures. Part 1.2: General Rules - Structural fire design. BSI: London.

CEN (2005b). EN 1994-1-2:2005, Eurocode 4: Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures – Part 1-2: General Rules – Structural Fire Design. Part 1-2: General Rules – Structural Fire Design. BSI: London.

CEN (2013). EN 13381-8:2013 Test methods for determining the contribution to the fire resistance of structural members. Part 8: Applied reactive protection to steel members. BSI: London.

Cirpici BK, Wang YC, Rogers B (2016a). Assessment of the thermal conductivity of intumescent coatings in fire. Fire Safety Journal, 81, 74-84.

Cirpici BK, Wang YC, Rogers BD, Bourbigot S (2016b). A theoretical model for quantifying expansion of intumescent coating under different heating conditions. Polymer Engineering & Science, 56(7), 798-809.

Di Blasi C (2004). Modeling the effects of high radiative heat fluxes on intumescent material decomposition. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 71(2), 721-737.

Horacek H, Pieh S (2000). The importance of intumescent systems for fire protection of plastic materials. Polymer International, 49(10), 1106-1114.

Jiang J, Main JA, Weigand JM, Sadek FH (2018). Thermal performance of composite slabs with profiled steel decking exposed to fire effects. Fire Safety Journal, 95, 25-41.

Mariappan T (2016). Recent developments of intumescent fire protection coatings for structural steel: A review. Journal of Fire Sciences, 34(2), 120-163.

Nguyen TT, Tan KH, Burgess IW (2015). Behaviour of composite slab-beam systems at elevated temperatures: Experimental and numerical investigation. Engineering Structures, 82, 199-213.

Podolski D (2017). Temperature Distribution in Intumescent Coating Protected Steel Sections. M.Sc. thesis, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Wang LL, Wang YC, Yuan JF, Li GQ (2013). Thermal conductivity of intumescent coating char after accelerated aging. Fire and Materials, 37(6), 440-456.

Wang YC (2002). Steel and Composite Structures - Behaviour and Design for Fire Safety. Spon Press, London.

Zhang Y, Wang YC, Bailey CG, Taylor AP (2012a). Global modelling of fire protection performance of an intumescent coating under different furnace fire conditions. Journal of Fire Sciences, 31(1), 51-72.

Zhang Y, Wang YC, Bailey CG, Taylor AP (2012b). Global modelling of fire protection performance of intumescent coating under different cone calorimeter heating conditions. Fire Safety Journal, 50, 51-62.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.