Research Articles | Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics

Comparison of short- and long-term ASR test methods on cementitious composites

Burak Sivrikaya, İlhami Demir, Özer Sevim


DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2020.02.003

Abstract


Concrete has a significant place in construction structures, is a material that can be easily damaged due to incorrect design, incorrect material selection. Concrete may be damaged by physical and chemical factors. One of these factors is the alkali-silica reaction (ASR). ASTM C1260, is a short-term test method, and ASTM C227, is a long-term test method, are used to measure effect of alkali-silica reaction. In this study, the effect of fly ash additive use with 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 wt.% replacement of cement was investigated in short- and long-term ASR test methods. For this purpose, while samples prepared for ASTM C1260 were kept in NaOH solution 14-days, samples prepared for ASTM C227 were waited 360-days in normal water solution. As a result; mortar bars with 20% fly ash additive ratio were classified as harmless for ASR in both test methods.


Keywords


ASTM C1260; ASTM C227; fly ash; alkali-silica reaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


ASTM C1260-14 (2014). Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates (Mortar-Bar Method). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

ASTM C227-10 (2010). Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Cement-Aggregate Combinations (Mortar-Bar Method). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.

Bagel L (1998). Strength and pore structure of ternary blended cement mortars containing blast furnace slag and silica fume. Cement and Concrete Research, 28(7), 1011–1022.

Capra B, Bournazel JP (1995). Perspectives nouvelles pour la prise en compte des alcali-réactions dans le calcul des structures. Materials and Structures, 28(2), 71–73.

Demir İ, Arslan M (2013). The mechanical and microstructural properties of Li2SO4, LiNO3, Li2CO3 and LiBr added mortars exposed to alkali–silica reaction. Construction and Building Materials, 42, 64–77.

Demir İ, Sevim Ö (2017). Effect of sulfate on cement mortars containing Li2SO4, LiNO3, Li2CO3 and LiBr. Construction and Building Materials, 156, 46–55.

Demir İ, Sevim Ö, Kalkan İ (2018). Microstructural properties of lithium-added cement mortars subjected to alkali–silica reactions. Sādhanā, 43(7), 112.

Diamond S, Penko M (1992). Alkali–silica reaction processes: the conversion of cement alkalies to alkali hydroxide. Proceedings of the Symposium on Durability of Concrete, ACI SP-131, 131, 153–168.

Dongxue L, Xinhua F, Xuequan W, Mingshu T (1997). Durability study of steel slag cement. Cement and Concrete Research, 27(7), 983–987.

Frohnsdorff G, Clifton JR, Brown PW (1978). History and status of standards relating to alkalies in hydraulic cements. ASTM International, Cement Standards-Evolution and Trends, West Conshohocken, PA.

Helmuth R, Stark D, Diamond S, Moranville-Regourd M (1993). Alkali–Silica Reactivity: An Overview of Research. National Research Council, Washington, DC.

Hobbs DW (1988). Alkali–Silica Reaction in Concrete. Thomas Telford Publishing, Michigan.

Monteiro PJM, Wang K, Sposito G, Dos Santos MC, de Andrade WP (1997). Influence of mineral admixtures on the alkali–aggregate reaction. Cement and Concrete Research, 27(12), 1899–1909.

Ramlochan T, Thomas M, Gruber KA (2000). The effect of metakaolin on alkali–silica reaction in concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 30(3), 339–344.

Stanton TE (1940). Influence of cement and aggregate on concrete expansion. Engineering News-Record, 59-61.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.