Research Articles | Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics

A comparative study on the structural performance of an RC building based on updated seismic design codes: case of Turkey

Ercan Işık


DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2021.03.002

Abstract


The destructive earthquakes and structural damages reveal the importance of the rules of earthquake-resistant structural design. The need of update and renewal of these rules periodically become inevitable as a result of scientific developments, innovations in construction technologies and building materials. Turkey which is an extremely region in terms of seismicity was adapted to these changes through time. The last five seismic design codes (1968, 1975, 1998, 2007 and 2018) were taken into account within the scope of this study. The differences in dimension and material grades of structural elements such as columns as beams have been compared in detail for each code. Three different analysis types have been performed for a 4-story reinforced-concrete model such as eigenvalue, pushover and dynamic time-history via the minimum conditions for these elements in each code. The natural vibration period of the building was obtained with empirical formulas stipulated in different codes for the sample RC building, additionally. The size and the type of the materials used in beams and columns within the last five codes have been changed. We see that the changes in these two important parameters which affect the behavior of buildings during an earthquake, enhance the performance of the building. It has been revealed that changes and renewals in seismic design codes are a necessity and gain. It has been clearly revealed that each amended code increases the stiffness and enhance the seismic capacity of a structure. Each updated seismic design code is aimed to complete the deficiency of the previous one. The results revealed that there are changes to be made to increase the seismic capacity of the structure at the point of reducing earthquake damage.


Keywords


Turkey; reinforced concrete; codes; pushover; time-history; eigenvalue

Full Text:

PDF

References


ABYYHY-1968 (1968). Specification for Structures to be built in Disaster Areas. Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved from https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/arsiv/12801.pdf

ABYYHY-1975 (1975). Specification for Structures to be built in Disaster Areas. Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved from https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/destek/icerikler/1_1_1975_deprem_yonetmel-g--20191127140243.pdf

ABYYHY-1998 (1998). Specification for Structures to be built in Disaster Areas. Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved from https://webdosya.csb.gov.tr/db/destek/icerikler/1_2_1997_deprem_yonetmel-g--20191127140319.pdf

Aksoylu C, Arslan MH (2019a). Empirical evaluation of periodic calculations for frame+shear wall type of reinforced concrete buildings according to TEC-2019 Standard. Uludağ University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering, 24(3), 365-382.

Aksoylu C, Arslan MH (2019b). Çerçeve türü betonarme binaların periyod hesaplarının farklı ampirik bağıntılara göre irdelenmesi. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 569-581. (in Turkish)

Aksoylu C, Arslan MH (2021). 2007 ve 2019 deprem yönetmeliklerinde betonarme binalar için yer alan farklı deprem kuvveti hesaplama yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılmalı olarak irdelenmesi. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 13(2), 359-374. (in Turkish)

Aksoylu C, Mobark A, Arslan MH, Hakkı Erkan İ (2020). A comparative study on ASCE 7-16, TBEC-2018 and TEC-2007 for reinforced concrete buildings. Revista de la Construcción, 19(2), 282-305.

Alyamaç KE, Erdoğan AS (2005). Geçmişten günümüze afet yönetmelikleri ve uygulamada karşılaşılan tasarım hataları. 4th National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Kocaeli, Turkey.

Antoniou S, Pinho R (2003). Seismostruct–Seismic Analysis Program by Seismosoft. Technical Manual and User Manual.

Bozer A (2020). Comparison of spectral accelerations according to DBYBHY 2007 and TBDY 2018 earthquake codes. Dicle Univercity Jounal of Engineering, 11(1), 393-404.

Caglar N, Demir A, Ozturk H, Akkaya A (2015). A simple formulation for effective flexural stiffness of circular reinforced concrete columns. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 38, 79-87.

Chopra, AK, Goel RK (2002). A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31(3), 561-582.

DBYYHY-2007 (2007). Turkish Earthquake Code. Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved from https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2007/03/20070306-3-1.pdf

EN 1998-3 (2005). Eurocode-8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance-Part 3: Assessment and Retrofitting of Buildings. European Committee for Standardization, Bruxelles, Belgium.

Eslami A, Ronagh HR (2014). Effect of elaborate plastic hinge definition on the pushover analysis of reinforced concrete buildings. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23(4), 254-271.

Estêvão JM, Oliveira CS (2015). A new analysis method for structural failure evaluation. Engineering Failure Analysis, 56, 573-584.

Fajfar P (1999). Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28(9), 979-993.

Hadzima-Nyarko M, Pavic G, Lesic M (2016). Seismic vulnerability of older confined masonry buildings in Osijek, Croatia. Earthquakes and Structures, 11(4), 629-648.

Hadzima-Nyarko M, Kalman Sipos T (2017). Insights from existing earthquake loss assessment research in Croatia. Earthquakes and Structures, 13(4), 365-375.

Inel M, Meral E (2016). Seismic performance of RC buildings subjected to past earthquakes in Turkey. Earthquakes and Structures, 11(3), 483-503.

Isik E, Kutanis M (2015). Performance based assessment for existing residential buildings in Lake Van basin and seismicity of the region. Earthquakes and Structures, 9(4), 893-910.

Isik E (2016). Consistency of the rapid assessment method for reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquakes and Structures, 11(5), 873-885.

Işık E, Özdemir M (2017). Performance based assessment of steel frame structures by different material models. International Journal of Steel Structures, 17(3), 1021-1031.

Isik E, Isik MF, Bulbul MA (2017). Web based evaluation of earthquake damages for reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquakes and Structures, 13(4), 387-396.

Işık E, Büyüksaraç A, Ekinci YL, Aydın MC, Harirchian E (2020a). The effect of site-specific design spectrum on earthquake-building parameters: a case study from the Marmara Region (NW Turkey). Applied Science, 10(20), 7247.

Işık E, Karaşin İB, Demirci A, Büyüksaraç A (2020b). Seismic risk priorities of site and mid-rise RC buildings in Turkey. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 6(4), 191-203.

Işık E, Harirchian E, Bilgin H, Jadhav K (2021). The effect of material strength and discontinuity in RC structures according to different site-specific design spectra. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, IN PRESS.

Jamadin A, Ibrahim Z, Jumaat MZ, Hosen MA (2020). Serviceability assessment of fatigued reinforced concrete structures using a dynamic response technique. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 9(3), 4450-4458.

Karaca H, Oral M, Erbil M (2020). Comparison of 2007 and 2019 Turkish earthquake codes in terms of design of structures, a case study in Nigde. Nigde Omer Halisdemir Univercity Journal of Engineering Sciences, 9(2), 898-903.

Karasin İB, Işık E, Demirci A, Aydin MC (2020). The effect of site-specific design spectra for geographical location on reinforced-concrete structure performance. Dicle Univercity Journal of Engineering, 11(3), 1319-1330.

Kemaloğlu M (2015). Historical and legal development of disaster management in Turkey. Akademik Bakış Dergisi, 5, 126-147.

Keskin E, Bozdoğan KB (2018). Evaluation of 2007 and 2018 Turkish earthquake code for the province of Kirklareli. Kirklareli University Journal of Engineering and Science, 4(1), 74-90.

Koçer M, Nakipoğlu A, Öztürk B, Al-hagri MG, Arslan MH (2018). Deprem kuvvetine esas spektral ivme değerlerinin TBDY 2018 ve TDY 2007’ye göre karşilaştirilmasi. Selcuk-Technic Journal, 17(2), 43-58. (in Turkish)

Kutanis M, Boru EO, Işık E (2017). Alternative instrumentation schemes for the structural identification of the reinforced concrete field test structure by ambient vibration measurements. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 21(5), 1793-1801.

Luo YF, Liu YP, Hu ZY, Xiong Z (2017). A new method for dynamic analysis of spatial lattice structures based on mode selection and mode construction techniques. International Journal of Steel Structures, 17(3), 1157-1170.

Mander JB, Priestley MJ, Park R (1988). Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. Journal of Structural Engineering, 114(8), 1804-1826.

Menegotto M (1973). Method of analysis for cyclically loaded RC plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. Proceedings of IABSE Symposium on Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well-Defined Repeated Loads, 15-22.

Nikoo M, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Khademi F, ad Mohasseb S (2017). Estimation of fundamental period of reinforced concrete shear wall buildings using self-organization feature map. Structural Engineerings and Mechanics, 63(2), 237-249.

Öztürk M (2018). An evaluation about 2018 Turkey Building Earthquake Regulations and Turkey earthquake hazards map based on Central Anatolia Region. Selcuk-Technic Journal, 17(2), 31-42.

Pinto PE, Franchin P (2011). Eurocode 8-Part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Proceedings of the Eurocode 8 Background and Applications, Dissemination of Information for Training, Lisbon, Portugal.

SeismoStruct v7 (2018). A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. Seismosoft. https://seismosoft.com/

TBDY-2018 (2018). Turkey Building Earthquake Regulation. Ankara, Turkey. Retrieved from https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/03/20180318M1-2-1.pdf

Ugalde D, Lopez-Garcia D, Parra PF (2020). Fragility-based analysis of the influence of effective stiffness of reinforced concrete members in shear wall buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 18(5), 2061-2082.

Vibration Data (2020). http://www.vibrationdata.com/elcentro.htm (Access date: 02.01.2020).

Wilding BV, Beyer K (2018). The effective stiffness of modern unreinforced masonry walls. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 47(8), 1683-1705.

Xian L, He Z, Ou X (2016). Incorporation of collapse safety margin into direct earthquake loss estimate. Earthquakes and Structures, 10(2), 429-450.

Yakut A (2004). Preliminary seismic performance assessment procedure for existing RC buildings. Engineering Structures, 26(10), 1447-1461.

Zuo Y, Zha X (2018). FEM and experimental study on mechanical property of integrated container building. International Journal of Steel Structures, 18(2), 699-718.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.