Research Articles | Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters

Behavior of GGBFS-modified DSM columns in clay soil: Strength–permeability characteristics and predictive laboratory modeling

Murat Olgun, Gülsüm Yalçınyiğit, Alican Şenkaya, Ekrem Burak Toka, Mustafa Abdalwahid Noori Noori, İbrahim Hakkı Erkan
Murat Olgun iD Department of Civil Engineering, Konya Technical University, 42250 Konya, Türkiye
Gülsüm Yalçınyiğit iD Investments Department of Konya Provincial Health Directorate, 42100 Konya, Türkiye
Alican Şenkaya iD Department of Civil Engineering, Konya Technical University, 42250 Konya, Türkiye
Ekrem Burak Toka iD * Department of Civil Engineering, Konya Technical University, 42250 Konya, Türkiye
Mustafa Abdalwahid Noori Noori iD Independent Researcher, 42000 Konya, Türkiye
İbrahim Hakkı Erkan iD Department of Civil Engineering, Konya Technical University, 42250 Konya, Türkiye
View Counter: Abstract | 0 times | ‒ Full Article | 0 times |
Citation Metadata Academic search Print Email (Login required) Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Contact author (Login required)

Full Text

View PDF

Abstract


This study investigated the influence of partially substituting cement with ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) on the unconfined compressive strength (UCS), splitting tensile strength (STS), and permeability coefficient (kDSM) of deep soil mixing (DSM) columns formed in clay soil. The water/binder ratio was kept constant at 1.0. Cast specimens were prepared using two binder contents, aw = 15% and 20% by dry soil mass, and five GGBFS substitution ratios of 0%, 10%, 20%, 35%, and 50%. Strength specimens were tested after 7, 28, and 56 days of curing, whereas permeability specimens were tested after 28 and 56 days. Four laboratory-scale DSM columns with a diameter of 300 mm and a length of 600 mm were formed for selected mixtures with aw = 20% and GGBFS ratios of 0%, 20%, 35%, and 50%; core samples were extracted after 28 days. UCS values ranged from 859 to 4939 kPa, STS from 182 to 830 kPa, and kDSM from 0.16×10⁻¹⁰ to 9.17×10⁻¹⁰ cm/s for cast specimens. GGBFS reduced early-age strength at 7 days, but improved strength and reduced permeability at later curing ages. The UCS and STS values of core samples were 45.26–69.79% and 63.00–77.58% of the corresponding cast specimen values, respectively, while permeability values of core samples were higher. SEM and XRD observations supported the formation of hydration and pozzolanic products.


Keywords


deep soil mixing; ground granulated blast furnace slag; permeability; splitting tensile strength; unconfined compressive strength

References


Abbey SJ, Ngambi S, Ngekpe BE (2015). Understanding the performance of deep mixed column improved soils: A review. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 6(3), 97-117.

Abbey SJ, Ngambi S, Ganjian E (2017). Development of strength models for prediction of unconfined compressive strength of cement/byproduct material improved soils. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 40(6), 928-935.

Abutaha F, Çelik Aİ (2025). The engineering properties of silica fume and GGBS-based geopolymer mortars cured in elevated temperature. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 16(2), 69-84.

Åhnberg H (2006). Consolidation stress effects on the strength of stabilised Swedish soils. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Ground Improvement, 10(1), 1-13.

ASTM C496 (2017). Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

ASTM C939 (2016). Standard test method for flow of grout for preplaced-aggregate concrete (flow cone method). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

ASTM C940 (2016). Standard test method for expansion and bleeding of freshly mixed grouts for preplaced-aggregate concrete in the laboratory. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

ASTM D2487 (2017). Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

ASTM D4832 (2016). Standard test method for preparation and testing of controlled low strength material (CLSM) test cylinders. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

ASTM D5084 (2016). Standard test methods for measurement of hydraulic conductivity of saturated porous materials using a flexible wall permeameter. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA.

Boufarh R, Aissaoui A, Djellali A, Goudjil K, Boukhatem G, Kırgız MS, Nagaprasad N, Krishnaraj R (2025). Comparative seismic analysis of T-shaped and conventional deep cement mixing columns in highway embankments on soft soil. Scientific Reports, 15, 45367.

Broms B (2003). Deep Soil Stabilization: Design and Construction of Lime and Lime/Cement Columns. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.

Bruce MEC, Berg RR, Filz GM, Terashi M, Yang DS, Collin JG (2013). Federal Highway Administration Design Manual: Deep Mixing for Embankment and Foundation Support. Technical Report FHWA-HRT-13-046. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, USA.

CDIT (2002). The Deep Mixing Method: Principle, Design and Construction. Coastal Development Institute of Technology, A.A. Balkema Publishers, Lisse, Netherlands.

Chaudhary PN, Pal J (2002). An overview of treatment of steel-making slag for recovery of lime and phosphorus values. Proceedings of the Seminar on Resurgence of Metallic Materials the Current Scenario (ROMM-2002), Jamshedpur, India, 186-190.

Cheah CB, Chung KY, Ramli M, Lim GK (2016). The engineering properties and microstructure development of cement mortar containing high volume of inter-grinded GGBS and PFA cured at ambient temperature. Construction and Building Materials, 122, 683-693.

Chen EJ, Liu Y, Lee FH (2016). A statistical model for the unconfined compressive strength of deep-mixed columns. Géotechnique, 66(5), 351-365.

Consoli NC, da Silva Lopes L Jr, Consoli BS, Festugato L (2014). Mohr-Coulomb failure envelopes of lime-treated soils. Géotechnique, 64(2), 165-170.

Consoli NC, Winter D, Rilho AS, Festugato L, Teixeira BS (2015). A testing procedure for predicting strength in artificially cemented soft soils. Engineering Geology, 195, 327-334.

Davidson LK, Demirel T, Handy RL (1965). Soil pulverization and lime migration in soil-lime stabilization. Highway Research Record, 92, 103-126.

Estabragh AR, Khatibi M, Javadi AA (2016). Effect of cement on treatment of a clay soil contaminated with glycerol. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 28(4), 04015157.

EuroSoilStab (2002). Development of Design and Construction Methods to Stabilize Soft Organic Soils: Design Guide Soft Soil Stabilization. European Commission, Industrial and Materials Technologies Programme (Brite-EuRam III), Brussels, Belgium.

Forsman J, Löfman M, Ikävalko J, Korkiala-Tanttu L (2025). Low-carbon binders in six test deep mixing cases: Variation of in-situ strength. Transportation Geotechnics, 53, 101597.

Fulambarkar S, Manna B, Shahu JT (2025). Effect of deep mixed column pattern on the performance of basal reinforced embankment resting on soft soil. Soils and Foundations, 65(2), 101578.

Ganjian E, Sadeghi-Pouya H, Claisse P, Waddell M, Hemmings S, Johansson S (2008). Plasterboard and gypsum waste in a novel cementitious binder for road construction. Concrete, 42(6), 20-22.

Ganjian E, Jalull G, Sadeghi-Pouya H (2015). Using waste materials and by-products to produce concrete paving blocks. Construction and Building Materials, 77, 270-275.

Han J (2015). Principles and Practice of Ground Improvement. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA.

He J, Wang X, Su Y, Li Z, Shi X (2019). Shear strength of stabilized clay treated with soda residue and ground granulated blast furnace slag. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 31(3), 06018029.

Holm G (2003). State of practice in dry deep mixing methods. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Grouting and Ground Treatment, New Orleans, LA, USA, 145-163.

Kitazume M, Maruyama K (2007). Internal stability of group column type deep mixing improved ground under embankment loading. Soils and Foundations, 47(3), 437-455.

Kitazume M, Grisolia M, Leder E, Marzano IP, Correia AAS, Oliveira PJV, Åhnberg H, Andersson M (2015). Applicability of molding procedures in laboratory mix tests for quality control and assurance of the deep mixing method. Soils and Foundations, 55(4), 761-777.

Lindh P, Lemenkova P (2022). Permeability, compressive strength and Proctor parameters of silts stabilised by Portland cement and ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS). Archive of Mechanical Engineering, 69(4), 667-692.

Mahmud H, Ahmed T, Islam MS (2025). Combined effect of rice husk ash and animal bone powder on strength and permeability of concrete. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 11(1), 1-13.

Mohamad N, Embong R, Othman NH, Muthusamy K, Jaafar MFM (2025). Flowability and compressive strength of ternary blended cement mortar of coal bottom ash and ground cockle shell ash. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 16(1), 25-32.

Nidzam RM, Kinuthia JM (2010). Sustainable soil stabilisation with blast furnace slag: A review. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Construction Materials, 163(3), 157-165.

Paniagua P, Ritter S, Moseid M, Okkenhaug G (2023). Bioashes and steel slag as alternative binders in ground improvement of quick clays. Proceedings of Geo-Congress 2023: Soil Improvement, Geoenvironmental, and Sustainability, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 25-34.

Ramírez AL, Korkiala-Tanttu L (2023). Stabilisation of Malmi soft clay with traditional and low-CO2 binders. Transportation Geotechnics, 38, 100920.

Richardson IG, Brough AR, Groves GW, Dobson CM (1994). The characterization of hardened alkali-activated blast-furnace slag pastes and the nature of the calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) phase. Cement and Concrete Research, 24(5), 813-829.

Sargent P (2015). The development of alkali-activated mixtures for soil stabilisation. In: Pacheco-Torgal F, Labrincha JA, Leonelli C, Palomo A, Chindaprasirt P, editors. Handbook of Alkali-Activated Cements, Mortars and Concretes. Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, Cambridge, UK, 555-604.

Saride S, Mypati VNK (2024). Effect of area improvement ratio of geopolymer-based deep mixing columns on swell-shrink behavior of expansive soils. Construction and Building Materials, 417, 135163.

Savila I-M, Korkiala-Tanttu L, Forsman J, Löfman M (2025). Mechanical properties of stabilized soil: Study on recovered field samples from deep stabilization sites. Transportation Geotechnics, 51, 101540.

Shaheen YBI, Etman ZA, Sabiha HL (2025). Design of reactive powder concrete mortar mixes through high strength and durability. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 16(3), 142-154.

Shakri MS, Hafez MA, Adnan MA, Nazaruddin AT (2014). Effects of use of PFA on strength of stone column and sand column. Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 19, 3745-3755.

Shen S-L, Xu Y-S, Han J, Zhang J-M (2012). A ten-year review on the development of soil mixing technologies in China. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Grouting and Deep Mixing, New Orleans, LA, USA, 343-356.

Subathra Devi V, Gnanavel BK (2014). Properties of concrete manufactured using steel slag. Procedia Engineering, 97, 95-104.

Suksiripattanapong C, Tesanasin T, Tiyasangthong S, Tabyang W, Sukontasukkul P, Chindaprasirt P (2023). Use of cement and bottom ash in deep mixing application for stabilization of soft Bangkok clay. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 48(4), 4583-4593.

Swamynaidu M, Tyagi A (2025). Hydraulic conductivity characteristics of slag-cement clay mixes applicable to in-situ soil mixing techniques. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 11, 40.

Takano M, Suzuki K, Shinkawa N (2015). Cement deep mixing in Lach Huyen port infrastructure construction project in northern Vietnam. Proceedings of the Deep Mixing 2015 Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Turan E, Alameri IA, Oltulu M (2025). Long-term durability of red mud-modified cement mortars: Effects of high temperature and freeze-thaw cycles. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 11(3), 116-127.

Urbánek J, Antoš P (2026). Utilization of fly dust generated during fired shale production for the preparation of aggregates and geopolymers. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 17(1), 71-81.

Ünal S, Canbaz M (2026). Development of a sustainable geopolymer structural element with waste glass powder: Mechanical characteristics. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 12(1), 22-29.

Xue Z, Zhang W, Zhao X, Meng F, Qin F, Xiao G, Nie Z, Chen J (2024). Utilization of cement deep mixing pile for soft soil foundation: A Malaysian case study. Frontiers in Materials, 11, 1484228.

Ye G, Shu H, Zhang Z, Kang S, Zhang S, Wang Q (2021). Solidification and field assessment of soft soil stabilized by a waste-based binder using deep mixing method. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 80(6), 5061-5074.

Yi Y, Liska M, Al-Tabbaa A (2014). Properties and microstructure of GGBS-magnesia pastes. Advances in Cement Research, 26(2), 114-122.

Yu H, Yi Y, Yao K, Romagnoli A, Tan WL, Chang ABP (2021). Effect of water/cement ratio on properties of cement-stabilized Singapore soft marine clay for wet deep mixing application. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 15(9), 1198-1205.

Zuo J, Wang B, Li W, Han S, Wang J, Zhang F (2023). Quality assessment and quality control of deep soil mixing columns based on a cement-content controlled method. Scientific Reports, 13, 4813.


Related Articles

  • Erkan Polat, Gökhan Karaman
    Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics (2025) 11(1) 24-41
    This study investigates the prediction of the strength of reinforced concrete deep beams, critical components in urban infrastructure, by evaluating their load-carrying capacities through finite element modeling and nonlinear inelastic analyses using LS-DYNA s...
  • Hasnain Mahmud, Towhid Ahmed, Md. Shafiqul Islam
    Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics (2025) 11(1) 1-13
    Concrete is a key component of construction, and its demand is rising quickly along with infrastructural development. Although cement and aggregates are still essential components for making concrete, the production of cement greatly increases CO2 emissions, n...
  • Yusuf Yıldız, Fethi Şermet
    Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics (2025) 11(2) 70-81
    In buildings without infill walls on the ground floor, structural irregularities, such as soft and weak storey irregularities can significantly reduce their resilience to earthquakes. These irregularities arise from insufficient lateral stiffness and strength ...
  • Yousry B. I. Shaheen, Zeinab A. Etman, Ahmed A. F. Mohamed
    Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics (2024) 10(4) 116-137
    The construction sector is a major contributor to resource consumption and waste generation. Therefore, developing more efficient and sustainable materials and infrastructure is a top priority for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. This research aims...
  • Kamel Kandil, Mostafa El-Shami, Ghada Mousa Hekal, Osama Magdy ElGouhary
    Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters (2025) 16(2) 95-114
    This study investigates the behavior of multi-cell steel columns (MCCs) under impact loading through both experimental and numerical analysis. Twelve specimens, including single-cell columns (SCC) and four-cell MCC configurations, were tested in empty and conc...