Mechanical behavior investigation of rubberized concrete barriers in impact load
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjcrl.2022.03.002
View Counter: Abstract | 412 times | ‒ Full Article | 132 times |
Full Text:
PDFAbstract
Approximately 1.5 million waste tires are produced annually. Waste tires in landfills and stocks cause toxic chemicals to pollute the soil and cause major fires. Waste tires are a global environmental problem. This problem gave an idea of recycling of waste tires instead of landfills and stocks. In this paper, an experimental study is conducted to review the behavior under impact load of rubberized concrete with conventional concrete. Three different mixes were made by adding crumb rubber (0%, 5% and 10%) by volume to the concrete. Nine cantilever column specimens of three type cross section (10x10, 15x15 and 20x20 cm2) were used to investigate the behavior under impact load. The specimens with higher rubberized concrete have longer impact load duration at the initial peak point. Specimens with rubber content become much flexible than normal specimens. Furthermore, the damage level of columns is greater with increasing rubber content. Therefore, the specimens with higher rubberized concrete absorb more impact energy. The barriers with higher rubber content minimize injury and demise when an accidental impact happens. Using concrete with rubber content reduces costs and produces an environmentally sustainable solution.
Keywords
References
Abdelmonem A, El-Feky MS, Nasr EAR, Kohail M (2019). Performance of high strength concrete containing recycled rubber. Construction and Building Materials, 227, 116660.
Alasmari HA, Bakar BH, Noaman AT (2019). A comparative study on the flexural behavior of rubberized and hybrid rubberized reinforced concrete beam. Civil Engineering Journal, 5(5), 1052-1067.
Al-Tayeb MM, Bakar BHA, Ismail H, Akil HM (2013). Effect of partial replacement of sand by recycled fine crumb rubber on the performance of hybrid rubberized-normal concrete under impact load: experiment and simulation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 284–289.
Apak MY, Yumrutaş Hİ (2021). An evaluation on measuring bollard performance experimentally on urban roadside safety. 3rd International Symposium of Engineering Applications on Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences.
Hassanli R, Youssf O, Mills JE (2017). Experimental investigations of reinforced rubberized concrete structural members. Journal of Building Engineering, 10, 149-165.
Molan AM, Ksaibati K (2018). Developing the new barrier condition index to unify the barrier assessments – a case study in Wind River Indian reservation, Wyoming. The Open Transformation Journal, 12, 182-191.
Pham TM, Zhang X, Elchalakani M, Karrech A, Hao H, Ryan A (2018). Dynamic response of rubberized concrete columns with and without FRP confinement subjected to lateral impact. Construction and Building Materials, 186, 207-218.
Shu X, Huang B (2014). Recycling of waste tire rubber in asphalt and portland cement concrete: An overview. Construction and Building Materials, 67, 217–224.
Siddika A, Mamun AA, Alyousef R, Amran YHM, Aslani F, Alabduljabbar H (2019). Properties and utilizations of waste tire rubber in concrete: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 224, 711-731.
Vadivel TS, Thenmozhi R (2010). Characteristic study on rubbercrete-an innovative construction material produced through waste tyre rubber. Manager’s Journal on Civil Engineering, 1(1), 34-39.
Youssf O, ElGawady MA, Mills JE (2015). Experimental investigation of crumb rubber concrete columns under seismic loading. Structures, 3, 13-27.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.