Research Articles | Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics

Comparative machine learning study for allowable bearing capacity prediction of OHTL tower foundations with spatially imputed geotechnical borehole databases’ interpretability

Esra Uray, Tahir Yildiz
Esra Uray iD * Department of Civil Engineering, KTO Karatay University, 42020 Konya, Türkiye
Tahir Yildiz iD Turkish Petroleum Offshore Technology Center (TP-OTC), 06530 Ankara, Türkiye
View Counter: Abstract | 0 times | ‒ Full Article | 0 times |
Citation Metadata Academic search Print Email (Login required) Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn Reddit WhatsApp Contact author (Login required)

Full Text

View PDF

Abstract


Geotechnical site characterization for alignment-based infrastructure projects, such as overhead transmission lines (OHTLs), involves the collection of extensive borehole datasets across hundreds of kilometers and the interpretation of thousands of results from laboratory and in-situ tests. In this study, a machine learning (ML) framework is proposed for predicting the allowable bearing capacity (qₐₗₗ, kPa) of OHTL tower spread footings using geotechnical borehole data. A dataset comprising 89 boreholes with 16 input parameters, including physical, mechanical, and seismic soil properties, was used. Missing borehole records (n=8) were spatially imputed using Inverse Distance Weighting (IDW) and K-Nearest Neighbors regression prior to model training. Ten ML algorithms, including Ridge, Lasso, ElasticNet, Support Vector Regression, K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Extra Trees, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, and LightGBM, were trained. Model performance was assessed using coefficient of determination (R²), root mean square error, mean absolute error, and mean absolute percentage error metrics. Random Forest was identified as the most reliable model for practical deployment, exhibiting balanced generalization behavior with training R² converging from 0.63 to 0.98 and a Train-CV Gap of 0.017, confirming that it learns generalizable patterns rather than memorizing individual observations. Although Gradient Boosting achieved the highest overall performance metrics, its persistent Train R² of 1.000 indicated memorization behavior. SHAP-based interpretability analysis identified groundwater depth, shear strength parameters, and standard penetration test blow count as the primary effective parameters of the qₐₗₗ value. The proposed framework shows that ML-based approaches can significantly enhance the reliability of bearing capacity predictions along transmission line corridors.


Keywords


bearing capacity; OHTL; borehole database; machine learning; geotechnical characterization; spatial imputation

References


Aliyev M, Şermet F, Gül R (2026). Structural performance analysis of steel piled offshore platforms under environmental loads. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 12(1), 30-44.

Baghbani A, Choudhury T, Costa S, Reiner J (2022). Application of artificial intelligence in geotechnical engineering: A state-of-the-art review. Earth-Science Reviews, 228, 103991.

Bergstra J, Bengio Y (2012). Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13(2), 281-305.

Bherde V, Gorantala N, Balunaini U (2025). Liquefaction susceptibility prediction using ML-based voting ensemble classifier. Natural Hazards, 121(4), 4359–4384.

Braja MD, Sivakugan N (2017). Principles of Foundation Engineering (9th Edition). Cengage.

Breiman L (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning, 45(1), 5–32.

Cao Y, Ni J, Chen J, Geng Y (2025). Rapid Evaluation Method to Vertical Bearing Capacity of Pile Group Foundation Based on Machine Learning. Sensors, 25(4), 1214.

Cascone E, Biondi G, Casablanca O (2021). Groundwater effect on bearing capacity of shallow strip footings. Computers and Geotechnics, 139, 104417.

Chen T, Guestrin C (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, California, USA, 785–794.

Cortes C, Jackel LD, Solla S, Vapnik V, Denker J (1993). Learning curves: asymptotic values and rate of convergence. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 6, 327-334.

Cover T, Hart P (1967). Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 13(1), 21–27.

Çarbaş S, Taymuş RB, Özdemir M (2025). Examining the effects of different seismic base isolators on the seismic behavior of a real-size steel truss structure. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 11(2), 106-115.

Demirci HE (2023). Geotechnical preliminary design of onshore wind turbine foundations. Erzincan University Journal of Science and Technology, 16(3), 756–781.

El Gendy M (2025). A comparative machine and deep learning approach for predicting ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations in cohesionless soil. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 40402.

Fahad RA, Shakir RR, Ali HM (2023). Evaluation on the SPT based design approach for shallow foundations. E3S Web of Conferences, 427, 01025.

Friedman JH (2001). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. The Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189–1232.

Geurts P, Ernst D, Wehenkel L (2006). Extremely randomized trees. Machine Learning, 63(1), 3–42.

Harirchian E (2024). Predicting compressive strength of AAC blocks through machine learning advancements. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 15(2), 56-68.

Harle SM, Wankhade RL (2025). Machine learning techniques for predictive modelling in geotechnical engineering: a succinct review. Discover Civil Engineering, 2(1), 86.

Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009). The Elements of Statistical Learning. Springer New York, USA.

Heim Z, Kandaris P, Houston S (2012). Simplified reliability-based geotechnical investigation and design of transmission lines. In: Geo-Frontiers 2011: Advances in Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE Library, Reston, Virginia, USA, 2968-2977.

Hoerl AE, Kennard RW (1970). Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12(1), 55–67.

Johnson K (2009). Geotechnical investigations for a transmission line are more than drilled borings. In: Electrical Transmission and Substation Structures 2009: Technology for the Next Generation, ASCE Library, Reston, Virginia, USA, 1–12.

Kahraman Y, Cakir F, Zulfikar AC, Gundogdu Gok M (2026). Seismic hazard and risk analyses of historical masonry structures in Kocaeli, Türkiye. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 12(1), 1-21.

Ke G, Meng Q, Finley T, Wang T, Chen W, Ma W, Ye Q, Liu T-Y (2017). LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Red Hook, Curran Associates Inc., NY, USA, 3149–3157.

Kordjazi A, Pooya Nejad F, Jaksa MB (2014). Prediction of ultimate axial load-carrying capacity of piles using a support vector machine based on CPT data. Computers and Geotechnics, 55, 91–102.

Li J, Heap AD (2011). A review of comparative studies of spatial interpolation methods in environmental sciences: Performance and impact factors. Ecological Informatics, 6(3–4), 228–241.

Lin A, Wotherspoon L, Blake D, Bradley B, Motha J (2019). National-scale infrastructure network exposure to liquefaction using geospatial models. Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication, 6(2), 61–66.

Meyerhof GG (1963). Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1(1), 16–26.

Moran PA (1950). A test for the serial independence of residuals. Biometrika, 37(1/2), 178–181.

More SS, Kambekar AR (2025). Performance evaluation of compressive strength of concrete using different machine learning algorithms. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 16(2), 60-68.

Mozer JD, Peyrot AH, DiGioia AM (1984). Probabilistic design of transmission line structures. Journal of Structural Engineering, 110(10), 2513–2528.

Mukherjee S, Tamayo P, Rogers S, Rifkin R, Engle A, Campbell C, Golub TR, Mesirov JP (2003). Estimating dataset size requirements for classifying DNA microarray data. Journal of Computational Biology, 10(2), 119–142.

Narwade R, Jadhav R (2025). Concrete strength monitoring and damage detection using piezoelectric-based wireless sensor. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, 16(1), 40-50.

Nawaz MN, Ali AS, Jaffar STA, Jafri TH, Oh T-M, Abdallah M, Karam S, Azab M (2022). Cost-based optimization of isolated footing in cohesive soils using generalized reduced gradient method. Buildings, 12(10), 1646.

Nejad FP, Jaksa MB, Kakhi M, McCabe BA (2009). Prediction of pile settlement using artificial neural networks based on standard penetration test data. Computers and Geotechnics, 36(7), 1125–1133.

Nguyen TT, Le VD, Huynh TQ, Nguyen NHT (2024). Influence of settlement on base resistance of long piles in soft soil—field and machine learning assessments. Geotechnics, 4(2), 447–469.

Onyelowe KC, Hanandeh S, Kamchoom V, Ebid AM, Reyes Silva FD, Allauca Palta JL, Llamuca Llamuca JL, Avudaiappan S (2025). Developing advanced datadriven framework to predict the bearing capacity of piles on rock. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 11051.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/handbook-on-constructing-composite-indicators-methodology-and-user-guide_9789264043466-en.html [accessed 15.01.2026].

Panagiotidou AI, Gazetas G, Gerolymos N (2012). Pushover and seismic response of foundations on stiff clay: Analysis with P-delta effects. Earthquake Spectra, 28(4), 1589–1618.

Peck RB, Hanson WE, Thornburn TH (1974). Foundation Engineering. 2 ed. John Wiley and Sons Inc., 514, New York, USA.

Phoon K-K, Kulhawy FH, Grigoriu MD (2000). Reliability-based design for transmission line structure foundations. Computers and Geotechnics, 26(3-4), 169–185.

Shafan T, Yi P (2024). Comparative analysis of performance of mat foundations in non-liquefiable and liquefiable soil. East African Journal of Engineering, 7(1), 187–198.

Shepard D (1968). A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. Proceedings of the 1968 23rd ACM National Conference, New York, USA, Association for Computing Machinery, 517–524.

Shooshpasha I, Hasanzadeh A, Taghavi A (2013). Prediction of the axial bearing capacity of piles by SPT-based and numerical design methods. GEOMATE Journal, 4(8), 560–564.

Soysal BF (2025). A discrete element method for evaluating the seismic performance of concrete gravity dam-reservoir systems under main shock-aftershock events. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 11(4), 229-244.

Stroud M (1974). The standard penetration test in insensitive clays and soft rocks. Proceedings of the 1st European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Stockholm, Sweden, 367–375.

Taylor KE (2001). Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 106(D7), 7183–7192.

Telló M, Pulz LT, Telló VB, Ferraz RG, Vidor FF, Gazzana DS (2021). An enhanced soil characterization study supported by resistivity data processing and standard penetration test. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 58(1), 49–58.

Terzaghi K (1943). Theoretical Soil Mechanics. 1 ed. Wiley, New York, USA.

Terzaghi K, Peck RB, Mesri G (1996). Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

Thirmanpalli S, Kommu S, Kadali S (2024). Design of shallow foundation on clayey strata using ground improvement techniques – a numerical study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2779(1), 012064.

Tibshirani R (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 58(1), 267–288.

Troyanskaya O, Cantor M, Sherlock G, Brown P, Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Botstein D, Altman RB (2001). Missing value estimation methods for DNA microarrays. Bioinformatics, 17(6), 520–525.

U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information (2005). LWST phase i project conceptual design study: evaluation of design and construction approaches for economical hybrid steel/concrete wind turbine towers. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/15011444 [accessed 15.01.2026].

Vabalas A, Gowen E, Poliakoff E, Casson AJ (2019). Machine learning algorithm validation with a limited sample size. PloS One, 14(11), e0224365.

Vapnik V, Golowich S, Smola A (1996). Support vector method for function approximation, regression estimation and signal processing. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Denver, Colorado, 281-287.

Vesić AS (1973). Analysis of ultimate loads of shallow foundations. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 99(1), 45–73.

Webster R, Oliver MA (2007). Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

Wu H, Aguilar V, Montgomery J (2025). Applications of machine learning to foundation design for transportation structures. Transportation Research Record, 2679(1), 556–568.

Yaghoubi E, Yaghoubi E, Khamees A, Vakili AH (2024). A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial neural network, machine learning, deep learning, and ensemble learning approaches in field of geotechnical engineering. Neural Computing and Applications, 36(21), 12655-12699.

Yilmaz M, Schubert S, Tinjum JM, Fratta D (2014). Foundation soil response to wind turbine generator loading. In: Geo-Congress 2014: Geo-Characterization and Modeling for Sustainability, ASCE Library, Reston, Virginia, USA, 1493–1502.

Zeini HA, Seno ME, Shehab EQ, Abood EA, Imran H, Bernardo LFA, Ribeiro TP (2025). Predicting the bearing capacity of shallow foundations on granular soil using ensemble machine learning models. Geotechnics, 5(3), 57.

Zou H, Hastie T (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 67(2), 301–320.


Related Articles

  • Muhammed Alperen Ozdemir
    Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics (2025) 11(3) 149-159
    This study investigates the seismic performance of traditional timber-framed (hımış) structures incorporating different types of infill materials through advanced nonlinear finite element modeling. Timber-infilled walls represent a widely used hybrid construct...
  • Alaa Ali Salman Al‐Taai, Waleed A. Waryosh
    Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters (2026) 17(2) 109-121
    The response of slender hybrid reinforced concrete columns composed of two advanced cementitious composites, self-compacting concrete (SCC) and reactive powder concrete (RPC), under biaxial eccentric compression has not been adequately documented. This study a...
  • Süleyman Kamil Akın, Ahmet Alagöz
    Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics (2024) 10(1) 21-33
    Masonry structures is one of the most preferred structure types throughout history. The advantageous of these structures can be categorized as longevity, affordability and easy access to materials. Due to a lack of information and constructive errors, masonry ...
  • Supriya Siddharth More, Ajaykumar R. Kambekar
    Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters (2025) 16(2) 60-68
    Accurately predicting the compressive strength of concrete is crucial for ensuring structural integrity, optimizing material usage, and reducing construction costs. Conventional experimental methods, though reliable, are often labour-intensive and time-consumi...
  • Yaren Aydın, Farnaz Ahadian, Gebrail Bekdaş, Sinan Melih Nigdeli
    Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics (2024) 10(3) 86-94
    Design optimization is an important engineering design topic. One of the important issues in structural design is to minimize the cost. This study based on an engineering problem of Welded Beam Design aims to minimize the cost of the beam with machine learning...