Statistical investigation of the effect of different damage conditions on the modal frequency value of a steel beam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2022.03.002
View Counter: Abstract | 139 times |, Full Article | 81 times |
Abstract
This study aimed to parametrically investigate the changes in modal frequency values on a steel beam caused by specified damaged schemes. In this context, the ANSYS Workbench software program was used to create a steel profile's finite-element model. A cantilever steel beam profile is created with a 60x60 mm cross-section and 3m length utilizing single-sided fixed support. In the finite-element model, the crack depth, width, and distance to the support were parametrically assigned as the damaged scheme to the steel profile. To investigate the effects of those damages on the modal frequency values of the steel profile, first of all, the modal frequency values for undamaged cases corresponding to the first ten-mode shapes were obtained. Then, the specified crack properties were determined parametrically, and the changes in frequency values for damaged cases were examined. In addition, a comparative evaluation of the effect of crack properties on the natural frequency of the steel element was performed by utilizing response surface and six sigma analysis. The analysis results demonstrated that specified crack schemes have different effects on different modal natural frequencies. The applied response surface and six sigma analysis provided important statistical data on the modal natural frequency values of the steel beam.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Altunışık AC, Okur FY, Kahya V (2017a). Automated model updating of multiple cracked cantilever beams for damage detection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 138, 499-512.
Altunışık AC, Okur FY, Kahya V (2017b). Modal parameter identification and vibration-based damage detection of a multiple cracked cantilever beam. Engineering Failure Analysis, 79, 154-170.
ANSYS (2013). Swanson Analysis System. Canonsburg, Pennsylvania.
Box GEP, Draper NR (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
Cheng J, Zhang J, Cai CS, Xiao RC (2007). A new approach for solving inverse reliability problems with implicit response functions. Engineering Structures, 29(1), 71-79.
Choi S, Park S, Stubbs N (2005). Non-destructive damage detection in structures using changes in compliance. International Journal of Soils and Structures, 42(15), 4494-4513.
Dey P, Talukdar S, Bordoloi DJ (2016). Multiple‐crack identification in a channel section steel beam using a combined response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. Structural Control Health Monitoring, 23(6), 938-959.
Doebling SW, Farrar CR, Prime MB (1998). A summary review of vibration-based damage identification methods. The Shock and Vibration Digest, 30(2), 91-105.
Fang SE, Perera R (2009). A response surface methodology-based damage identification technique. Smart Material and Structures, 18(6), 065009.
Gillich GR, Praisach ZI, Iavornic CM (2012). Reliable method to detect and assess damages in beams based on frequency changes. Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, New York, USA, 129-137.
Gounaris G, Dimarogonas A (1988). A finite element of a cracked prismatic beam for structural analysis. Computer and Structures, 28(3), 309-313.
Guo QT and Zhang LM (2004), Finite element model updating based on response surface methodology. Proceedings of the 22nd International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), Dearborn, USA, 306-309.
Landman D, Simpson J, Vicroy D, Parker P (2007). Response surface methods for efficient complex aircraft configuration aerodynamic characterization. Journal of Aircraft, 44(4), 1189-1195.
Mermertas V, Erol H (2001). Effect of mass attachment in the free vibration of cracked beam. Proceedings of the 8th International congress on Sound and Vibration, Hong Kong, China, 2803-2810.
Mohammad HD (1997). A comprehensive crack identification algorithm for beams under different end conditions. Applied Acoustics, 51(4), 381-398.
Montalvao D, Maia NMM, Riberio AMR (2006). A review of vibration-based structural health monitoring with special emphasis on composite materials. The Shock and Vibration Digest, 38(4), 295-324.
Ostachowicz WM, Kraawczuk M (1991). Analysis of the effect of cracks on the natural frequencies of a cantilever beam. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 150(2), 191-201.
Owolabi GM, Swamidas ASJ, Seshadri R (2003). Crack detection in beams using changes in frequencies and amplitudes of frequency response functions. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 265(1), 1-22.
Ren WX, Chen HB (2010). Finite element model updating in structural dynamics by using the response surface method. Engineering Strucures, 32(8), 2455–2465.
Rytter A (1993). Vibrational Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures. PhD thesis, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Srinivasan, MG Kot CA (1992). Effect of damage on the modal parameters of a cylindrical shell (No. ANL/CP-74111; CONF-920234-3). Argonne National Lab., IL, USA.
Umar S, Bakharya N, Abidin ARZ (2018), Response surface methodology for damage detection using frequency and mode shape. Measurement, 115, 258-268.
Wagner JR, Mount III EM, Giles HF (2014). Shear Rate, Pressure Drop, and Other Extruder Calculations. William A editor. In Extrusion: The Definitive Processing Guide and Handbook, 2nd Edition, USA, 203-206.
Yendhe VS, Kadlag PVL, Shelke PRS (2016). Vibration analysis of cracked cantilever beam for varying crack size and location. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 3(8), 1913-1919.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.