A discrete element method for evaluating the seismic performance of concrete gravity dam-reservoir systems under main shock-aftershock events
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2025.04.005
View Counter: Abstract | 243 times | ‒ Full Article | 84 times |
Full Text:
PDFAbstract
Dams are crucial for water supply, flood prevention, and hydroelectric power generation. Often located in seismically active regions, they are vulnerable to main shock-aftershock (MS-AS) sequences, which can compromise structural integrity and hydraulic safety. Critical aspects of dam response to MS–AS events remain unclear, particularly the required rest time between successive events and threshold AS-to-MS intensity measure ratios that could serve as predictors of additional damage. This study addresses these gaps by analyzing concrete gravity dam–reservoir systems of three heights (50 m, 100 m, and 150 m) using the developed discrete element–based approach coupled with displacement/pressure-based mixed finite elements for the reservoir. Empirical rest time equations were derived from 124 as-recorded ground motions, while seismic performance under varying intensity levels was evaluated using 14 as-recorded MS–AS sequences. Damage was quantified using discrete indices of base crack length, maximum base crack width, and maximum total upstream crack width. Results indicate that AS primarily propagate existing cracks at lower intensities, whereas higher intensities generate new cracks along the upstream face, increasing crack widths by 25–30% on average. The 50 m high dam remained within the mild damage category, while taller dams occasionally reached moderate levels, posing potential seepage risks. Threshold AS-to-MS ratios for four different intensity measures were identified. These findings provide mechanistic insight into crack propagation under MS-AS events, providing practical guidance for post-earthquake dam safety assessment, inspection prioritization, and incorporating sequential seismic effects into design and emergency planning.
Keywords
References
Akköse M, Dumanoğlu AA, Bayraktar A (2016). Seismic analysis of arch dams subjected to in-phase and anti-phase ground motions. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 2(2), 85-92.
Akpinar U, Arici Y, Binici B (2023). Post-earthquake effects on the seismic performance of concrete gravity dams. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 21(1), 10-23.
Alliard PM, Leger P (2008). Earthquake safety evaluation of gravity dams considering aftershocks and reduced drainage efficiency. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 134, 12-22.
Amadio C, Fragiacomo M, Rajgelj S (2003). The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non-linear response of SDOF systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 32, 291-308.
Ashna KN, Maheshwari P, Viladkar MN (2024). Fragility analysis of a concrete gravity dam under mainshock-aftershock sequences. Structures, 61, 106117.
Bybordiani M, Arici Y (2017). The use of 3D modeling for the prediction of the seismic demands on the gravity dams. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 46(11), 1769-1789.
Carpinteri A, Valente S, Ferrara G, Imperato L (1992). Experimental and numerical fracture modelling of a gravity dam. ACI Symposium Publication, 143, 107-122.
Chen D-H, Yang Z-H, Wang M, Xie J-H (2019). Seismic performance and failure modes of the Jin’anqiao concrete gravity dam based on incremental dynamic analysis. Engineering Failure Analysis, 100, 227-244.
Chopra AK (1978). Earthquake resistant design of concrete gravity dams. Journal of the Structural Division, 104, 953-971.
Fahlbusch H (2009). Early dams. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Engineering History and Heritage, 162(1), 13-18.
Faisal A, Majid TA, Hatzigeorgiou GD (2013). Investigation of story ductility demands of inelastic concrete frames subjected to repeated earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 44, 42-53.
Fragiacomo M, Amadio C, Macorini L (2004). Seismic response of steel frames under repeated earthquake ground motions. Engineering Structures, 24, 2021-2035.
Ghallab A (2020). Simulation of cracking in high concrete gravity dam using the Extended Finite Elements by ABAQUS. American Journal of Mechanics and Applications, 8(1), 7-15.
Gopalaratnam VS, Shah SP (1985). Softening response of plain concrete in direct tension. Journal of the American Concrete Institute, 82(3), 310-323.
Guo X, Zhang Z, Chen ZQ (2020). Mainshock-integrated aftershock vulnerability assessment of bridge structures. Applied Sciences, 10, 6843.
Hacıefendioğlu K, Akköse M, Bayraktar A, Dumanoğlu AA (2015). Shear strain related non-linear stochastic dynamic analysis of rock-fill dams. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, 1(2), 59-64.
Hariri-Ardebili MA, Kianoush MR (2014). Integrative seismic safety evaluation of a high concrete arch dam. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 67, 85-101.
Hariri-Ardebili MA, Saouma VE (2016). Collapse fragility curves for concrete dams: comprehensive study. Journal of Structural Engineering, 142(10), 04016075.
Hatzigeorgiou GD (2010). Behavior factors for nonlinear structures subjected to multiple near-fault earthquakes. Computers & Structures, 88, 309-321.
Hatzigeorgiou GD, Beskos DE (2009). Inelastic displacement ratios for SDOF structures subjected to repeated earthquakes. Engineering Structures, 31, 2744-2755.
Huang J (2014). Effects of near-fault ground motions on the seismic performance of concrete gravity dams. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014, Porto, Portugal.
International Commission on Large Dams (2023). World Register of Dams (Database Presentation), International Commission on Large Dams. https://www.icold-cigb.org/GB/world_register/database_presentation.asp [accessed 21-2-2024].
Khanal A (2019). Seismic Performance of Earth Slopes Subjected to Earthquake Mainshock – Aftershock Sequences. M.Sc. thesis, University of Texas at Tyler, Texas, USA.
Leger P, Leclerc M (1996). Evaluation of earthquake ground motions to predict cracking response of gravity dams. Engineering Structures, 18(3), 227-239.
Li Y, Song R, van de Lindt JW (2014). Collapse fragility of steel structures subjected to earthquake mainshock-aftershock sequences. Journal of Structural Engineering, 140(12), 04014095.
Lokke A, Chopra AK (2013). Response Spectrum Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams Including Dam-Water-Foundation Interaction. PEER Report 2013/17, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Headquarters at the University of California, Berkeley.
Maekawa K, Okamura H, Pimanmas A (2003). Non-Linear Mechanics of Reinforced Concrete. 1st ed. CRC Press, London, UK.
Mangalathu S, Shokrabadi M, Burton HV (2019). Aftershock Seismic Vulnerability and Time-Dependent Risk Assessment of Bridges. PEER Report 2019/04, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Headquarters at the University of California, Berkeley.
Meguro K, Tagel-Din H (2000). Applied element method for structural analysis: theory and application for linear materials. Structural Engineering/Earthquake Engineering, 17(1), 21s–35s.
Mignan A (2014). The debate on the prognostic value of earthquake foreshocks: A meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 4, 4099.
Mooney CZ, Duval RD (1993). Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference. Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-095. Newbury Park, CA, USA.
Pang R, Xu B, Zhang X, Zhou Y, Kong X (2019). Seismic performance investigation of high CFRDs subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 116, 82-85.
Pekau OA, Zhu X (2008). Effect of seismic uplift pressure on the behavior of concrete gravity dams with a penetrated crack. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 134(11), 991-999.
Pirooz RM, Habashi S, Massumi A (2021). Required time gap between mainshock and aftershock for dynamic analysis of structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 19, 2643-2670.
RILEM TC 104 (1991). Damage classification of concrete structures. The state of the art report of RILEM Technical Committee 04-DCC activity. Materials and Structures, 24(142), 253-259.
Risk Management Solutions (2008). Risk Management Solutions Reconnaissance Report: The 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake: Risk Management Lessons and Implications. Risk Management Solutions, Newark, CA, USA.
Sadeghi MH, Moradloo J (2022). Seismic analysis of damaged concrete gravity dams subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 26, 2417-2438.
Sommerfeld A (1949). Partial Differential Equations in Physics. 1st ed. Academic Press, New York.
Soysal Albostan BF (2021). Discrete Element Based Analyses of Structure-Reservoir Problem for Gravity Dams. Ph.D. thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
Soysal BF, Arici Y, Tuncay K (2023). A modified applied element model for the simulation of plain concrete behaviour. Magazine of Concrete Research, 75, 325-338.
Soysal BF, Arici Y (2024). The use of discrete element models for the seismic assessment of concrete gravity dams. Structures, 70, 107831.
SRC (n.d.). Dams & earthquakes. Seismology Research Centre. https://www.src.com.au/earthquakes/seismology-101/dams-earthquakes [accessed 21-2-2024].
Toikka L, Grover L, Hull A, Rossiter M (2019). Site-specific seismic analysis for concrete gravity dams: a case study from Ontario. 12th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Quebec, QC, Canada, 1-8.
United States Geological Survey (2015). Magnitude 7.8 earthquake Nepal Aftershocks. United States Geological Survey. https://www.usgs.gov/news/featured-story/magnitude-78-earthquake-nepal-aftershocks [accessed 21-2-2024].
Wang G, Wang Y, Lu W, Yan P, Zhou W, Chen M (2017). Damage demand assessment of mainshock-damaged concrete gravity dams subjected to aftershocks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 98, 141-154.
Wang M, Chen J, Wu L, Song B (2018). Hydrodynamic pressure on gravity dams with different heights and the Westergaard correction formula. International Journal of Geomechanics, 18(10), 04018134.
Wang G, Wang Y, Lu W, Yan P, Chen M (2020). Earthquake direction effects on seismic performance of concrete gravity dams to mainshock-aftershock sequences. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 24, 1134-1155.
Wang X, Bathe KJ (1997). Displacement/pressure based mixed finite element formulations for acoustic fluid-structure interaction problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 40, 2001-2017.
Wei Q, Shen L, Dunai L, Kövesdi B, Elqudah S, Cao M (2024). Quantitative evaluation on the effects of the spatial variability in concrete materials on seismic damage of concrete gravity dams. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 307, 110287.
Wen R, Zhou Z, Li X, Yang C, Wang Y, Liu Q, Cui J (2009). The strong ground motion observation for the Wenchuan aftershock. Earthquake Science, 22, 181–187.
Zhai Y, Zhang L, Bi Z, Zhang H, Cui, B (2022). Seismic performance evaluation of AAR-affected concrete gravity dams under main aftershock sequence. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 157, 107258.
Zhang L, Zhai Y, Chen D, Cui X (2019). Study on influence of dam foundation damage on seismic safety of gravity dam under combined action of main shock and aftershock. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 304, 042063.
Zhang L, Zhai Y, Cui B, Tang Y, Bi Z (2021). A novel method for constructing main-aftershock sequences and its application in the global damage accumulation effects analysis of gravity dams. Shock and Vibration, 3, 1-12.
Zhang S, Wang G, Sa W (2013). Damage evaluation of concrete gravity dams under mainshock-aftershock seismic sequences. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 50, 16-27.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.








