Research Articles | Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics

Seismic performance assessment of timber-framed (hımış) structures with different infill materials

Muhammed Alperen Ozdemir


DOI: https://doi.org/10.20528/cjsmec.2025.03.004
View Counter: Abstract | 81 times | ‒ Full Article | 20 times |

Full Text:

PDF

Abstract


This study investigates the seismic performance of traditional timber-framed (hımış) structures incorporating different types of infill materials through advanced nonlinear finite element modeling. Timber-infilled walls represent a widely used hybrid construction typology in seismic regions, where the interaction between the ductile timber frame and brittle infill materials critically influences structural behavior. Four configurations are analyzed: (1) Timber frame with adobe (mudbrick) infill; (2) Timber frame with fired clay brick infill; (3) Timber frame with natural rubble stone infill; and (4) Bare timber frame. A series of three-dimensional pushover analyses are conducted using ANSYS Workbench, where all materials are modeled using Multilinear Isotropic Hardening plasticity, including contact-based interface definitions and geometric nonlinearity. The mechanical behavior of each wall system is interpreted based on key seismic performance indicators, including initial lateral stiffness, base shear capacity, effective displacement ductility, and energy dissipation. Results show that while infill materials significantly increase the lateral strength and stiffness of the wall systems, they also introduce varying degrees of brittleness and reduced ductility. These findings emphasize the critical role of infill type in the seismic response of timber-framed walls and highlight the importance of understanding frame–infill interaction for the assessment and retrofitting of traditional building stock in earthquake-prone regions.


Keywords


timber-framed structures; hımış structures; infill materials; seismic behavior; pushover analysis

References


Aktaş YD (2017). Seismic resistance of traditional timber-frame hımış structures in Turkey: A brief overview. International Wood Products Journal, 8(sup1), 21-28.

Dikmen N (2010). An investigation on traditional timber-framed buildings in Çankırı province of Turkey. Trakya University Journal of Science, 11(1), 15-27.

Dima DI, Dutu A (2016). Traditional buildings with timber frame and various infills in Romania. Proceedings of the WCTE 2016 World Conference on Timber Engineering, Vienna, Austria, August 22-25, 1-9.

Dutu A, Niste M, Spatarelu I, Dima DI, Kishiki S (2018b). Seismic evaluation of Romanian traditional buildings with timber frame and mud masonry infills by in-plane static cyclic tests. Engineering Structures, 167, 655-670.

Gani A, Banday JM, Rai DC (2024). Seismic behavior of timber-framed structures infilled with dry brick masonry. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 22(13), 6419-6446.

Karaman ÖY, Zeren MT (2015). Case study: Examples of wooden vernacular architecture – Turkish houses in Western Anatolia. YBL Journal of Built Environment, 3(1-2), 77-87.

NAVFAC DM7-02 (1982). Foundations and Earth Structures. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Alexandria, VA, USA.

Qu Z, Fu X, Kishiki S, Cui Y (2020). Behavior of masonry infilled Chuandou timber frames subjected to in-plane cyclic loading. Engineering Structures, 211, 110449.

Tan W, Zhou T, Zhu L, Zhao X, Yu W, Zhang L, Liang Z (2024). Seismic performance of a single-story timber-framed masonry structure strengthened with fiber-reinforced cement mortar. Materials, 17(15), 3644.

Vieux-Champagne F, Sieffert Y, Grange S, Polastri A, Ceccotti A, Daudeville L (2014). Experimental analysis of seismic resistance of timber-framed structures with stones and earth infill. Engineering Structures, 69, 102-115.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.